Wednesday, June 27, 2007

77 Million Paintings by Brian Eno


Conceived by Brian Eno as "visual music", his latest artwork, 77 Million Paintings is a constantly evolving sound and imagescape which continues his exploration into light as an artist's medium and the aesthetic possibilities of "generative software".

He first created 77 Million Paintings to bring art to the increasing number of flat panel TV's and monitors that often sit darkened and underutilized. Now Eno is also showing large installations of this work, recently at the Venice Bienniale and Milan Triennale, and in Tokyo, London and South Africa. The installation at Yerba Buena Center for the Arts will be the North American Premiere of his work.

The installation is mesmerizing; comprised of flat panel monitors, running multiple instances of 77 Million Paintings, the kaleidoscopic displays and slow, rhythmic evolution of the artwork create a singular experience for the viewer.

***

The Future of TV by Ricky Gervais


Ricky Gervais on TV's future

From: BBC NEWS

Ricky Gervais is one of the first big stars to create original video and audio material just for the internet.

The Office and Extras star's radio-style audio podcasts on iTunes have become record-breakers, while his video podcasts have also attracted a large following.

Why did you start making audio shows just for the internet?

Anything that increases artistic freedom is exciting for me. We didn't have a boss. We didn't have rules or restrictions that you do on radio.

We could do it when we wanted, for as long as we wanted. We could put it up there and then people would go to it at any time.

But I suppose the most exciting thing is that it's global. If you've got a computer and an MP3 player and a phone line, you can listen to it all around the world. And they did. And that's because The Office is shown in 80 countries.


What has the response taught you about how people want stuff on the web?

I think that first series got about four to five million downloads. And it's still going. That's a lot of people. That's quite a big TV show. And I think it was Karl [Pilkington, sidekick] who said: 'Why don't we charge for it?' He'd just given up his job.

We honestly didn't do it for the money - we did it as an experiment. We thought - would people pay? And I think they did because they didn't have a choice, it wasn't available free any more.

But I think they also thought it's only a quid. And it wouldn't have worked if it was a breakfast show every single day of the year for 10 years.

In all now we've had about 10 million downloads, but that will do for now. It's not going to be the main part of our business because I get bored very quickly. I have the attention span of a child.

We'll do some more but it was never meant to be a realistic business venture. It was more like I wonder if it could be a business venture. It worked out for us.

Are you going to start selling original TV-style video online or do deals with websites to create original video?

We put out some free videos. We just made little films, little sketches. Sometimes it was just us chatting.

Now I don't think we could do that as a business venture because with audio, you can compete with anything. You can compete with comedy records or with radio shows if you've got a decent microphone and something to record it on and something to listen back on.

Whereas you can't compete with great DVD and video. You can't knock up an episode of The Sopranos or 24 on a little handheld digital camera. So I don't think that would work.

I don't think you'll ever be able to sidestep TV or DVD. But TV companies will embrace it. With the American Office, they did things called webisodes where some of the peripheral characters had their own storylines and they did little 10-minute things and put them out.

Now that's exciting for fans, it's like a DVD extra or something. And it's an advert. You might come across that before you've actually sat down and watched The Office on a Thursday night on NBC.


What if someone like Google offered you a lot of money to make a TV-style show - but just for their site?

I could see it happening but I'd think - what's the point?

I haven't seen it being too damaging because at the moment, most people aren't downloading. Your aunts and uncles, they're not going on YouTube or scouring the internet to find On the Buses.

But they will see it in Woolworths if someone re-releases it and says On the Buses Retrospective. So that's still the bigger business at the moment.

What is exciting about this is choice, and we don't know where it will go because we don't know how many people soon will have a computer and an iPod.

I'm sure when the BBC first launched, they were going: 'Ah, not many people have got tellies. Who's watching this?' So it's good to get your act together. And then people catch up with the know-how and the means to watch it.


Have you got any favourite online viewing?

I still wouldn't call myself a big internet buff. I've got e-mail. I Google things now as opposed to going to the library or Encyclopaedia Britannica.

But there are half a dozen websites that I go to - the BBC, some entertainment websites and YouTube. And that's about it.

I probably spend an hour a day online and that's enough really. Whereas it would still be three hours in front of the telly. So telly's still winning.


***

Monday, June 25, 2007

Renouncing the Dark Arts


Banks Violette’s latest gallery show slinks away from the world of goth

NYMAG.COM: A few years ago, Chelsea looked like a teenager going through its goth phase. Some weeks, the galleries resembled the set of a cheesy horror movie—all fangs and skulls and black makeup, with show titles like “Scream” and “Flesh and Blood.” Sue de Beer was showing videos of goth Girl Scouts, and David Altmejd was building installations around dead werewolves. And Banks Violette’s glossy black sculptures and high-contrast drawings, inspired by murder-suicides and Scandinavian black metal, were among the highest profile of them all. The 34-year-old from Ithaca played up his gloom-and-doom image, too. The guy has a giant spiderweb tattoo on his neck that, as his Adam’s apple bobs as he talks, appears to be choking him. Vanity Fair photographed him lighting a Marlboro with a blowtorch, and when a British journalist asked him if he worshipped Satan, he responded with a long-winded affirmation, citing Hegel.

But Violette’s works were also less campy and juvenile than a lot of art from that scene, courting curators with smart formal references to seventies-era sculptors like Robert Smithson and Barry Le Va. That sense of history gives him a direction out of the goth ghetto, and on June 28, when he opens his first New York solo show in five years (a double, at both Team and Gladstone galleries), the art world will be clamoring to see whether he’s come into the light. The new work has no evil-teen backstory, like the 1995 murder of a teenage girl by Slayer fans that inspired his 2002 installation Arroyo Grande. Instead, it’s a landscape of sculptural forms—broken grids and mirrors, scatterings of fluorescent tubes—reminiscent of Sol LeWitt and Richard Serra. Except that LeWitt and Serra never hooked their art up to propane tanks or refrigeration units.

The change isn’t quite so dramatic as those makeovers of black-eyeshadowed kids on Ricki Lake, but it does amount to a new maturity. “Those narratives illustrated something that I was interested in, but I’ve done it enough times that I don’t need to rely on them anymore,” he says. “Also, the violence ended up obscuring what I was really trying to talk about—oooh, spooky.” That Satan-worshipping quote? “I was really drunk; it was a total piss-take,” Violette says, laughing. “I still know people who have a real interest in that, but I was raised completely atheist. That kind of religiosity scares the crap out of me.”

So Violette’s challenge has been to make his art more abstract without sacrificing intensity. Commissioning music for his installations has been one approach—especially when the music in question sounds, in Violette’s words, like “Kabuki-painted Vikings shrieking through the grim North.” Last year, he teamed up with the band Sunn 0))) for a performance at the Maureen Paley gallery in London. (Violette is a hit in Europe, where they think he represents a particularly American dystopia.) At that opening, guest vocalist Attila Csihar sang from inside a sealed coffin. An audience of hundreds formed outside the gallery to hear, and feel, the music. “There was this total moment of terror,” Violette recalls. “Then, when they started, it was definitely one of the loudest things I’ve ever heard. The entire audience outside just took a huge step backwards. I almost collapsed with relief. And then cracks started forming in the ceiling. Lightbulbs blew out.” The event quickly became art-world legend, and this new show at Gladstone, says Violette, is its continuation, with low-frequency audio composed by Sunn 0)))’s Stephen O’Malley. The artist likens the listening experience to the drop in pressure before a thunderstorm: “It suddenly feels like space is evacuating.”

In an art world filled with poses, Violette’s nihilism, at least, is no act. He dropped out of high school after getting into crystal meth, then worked as a tattoo artist in Hawaii before getting a G.E.D. Thinking that he’d “parlay my visual aptitude into a productive job, photography or graphic design or whatever,” he enrolled at SVA, where, in a scene straight out of Art School Confidential, his freshman painting teacher, the artist Steve DiBenedetto, told his students that they should all become dental hygienists. “So I got involved with fine arts for the pettiest reason: [to say] screw you.” (He and DiBenedetto are now friends.) From there it was on to Columbia, then group shows, representation at Team Gallery, and the 2004 Whitney Biennial, where he showed glossy stalagmite-like sculptures and drawings that invoked the end of grunge.

The Whitney curators liked him so much that they gave him a solo show the next year. His installation—a ruined church cast in salt—had a nerve-jangling soundtrack by Snorre Ruch, a Norwegian black-metal musician who did jail time for associating with his bandmate, a convicted murderer. “The idea is, he’s the accomplice, I’m the accomplice, and we turned the audience into the third accomplice,” says Violette. The Whitney’s project gallery can feel bland; Violette transformed it into a haunted space. That the museum was simultaneously showing work by Robert Smithson, one of Violette’s idols, wasn’t lost on the young artist. “Salt was Smithson’s signature material, and the first time Smithson ever used salt was at Cornell,” he says. “There was a Cargill mine where he got the salt—when I was growing up, I used to take lots of drugs and run around the salt mine. It was personal entropy,” he says, using one of Smithson’s favorite words. “And socioeconomic entropy, about burnt-out upstate New York.”

Will Violette get out of the black-velvet-lined coffin for good? His critics say that he needs to curb his instinct to reference other artists, that he risks being a second-generation Smithson. And he’s faced with the same paradox as all subcultures: As they become more accessible, especially online, where they can spawn collaborations and tributes worldwide, they risk losing the particular weirdness that makes them interesting. When I visit his studio, there is one sign of mainstream culture: The music blaring from the workroom, where assistants are fabricating sculptures, is not Sunn 0))) or Dark Throne but The Joshua Tree. “I don’t know why there’s U2 playing,” he jokes, shaking his head. “I’m going to have to start firing people.”

***

Saturday, June 23, 2007

Dark Tourism: Vacationing at Auschwitz


Photographs of prisoners line the walls of the museum at the Auschwitz death camp.




These tracks lead directly to the site of the Birkenau crematorium.

DEPRESSING DESTINATIONS

TIME.COM: Thus the Sex Pistols, on their calculated-to-shock debut album 30 years ago. But today, a holiday stop at the former Nazi concentration camp at Belsen is far from unthinkable; it's a common destination, together with Auschwitz, Dachau and Treblinka, in the growing travel niche market known as "Dark Tourism."

I don't wanna holiday in the sun
I wanna go to new Belsen
I wanna see some history
'Cause now I got a reasonable economy
While many of us will head for the beaches, the mountains and the amusement parks this summer, some will be going to un-amusement parks. Lonely Planet, a leading publisher of travel guides, predicts in its Blue List — a summary of 2007 travel trends — that dark tourism will be one of the major growth areas in the industry. Some people want a holiday experience that others would deem anything but a holiday. "Travel to sites associated with death, disaster + depravity," is how Lonely Planet defines dark tourism. We're talking not only about the concentration camps, but also South Africa's apartheid museum and Robben Island prison; Vietnam's Ho Chi Minh trail; the Enola Gay at the Smithsonian; the old dockside slave dungeons of West Africa; the Tuol Sleng Killing Fields outside Phnom Penh; Rwanda's genocide memorials; even Katrina tours of New Orleans .

New York City's Ground Zero is probably the most famous example of a disaster site that almost immediately became a tourist attraction, and to considerable controversy. But it's not only recent catastrophes that attract: Auschwitz-Birkenau saw a 37% increase in visitors in 2004.

My work has taken me to a fair few of the destinations on the dark-tourism itinerary, but increasingly, I'm visiting them with a brochure. Afghanistan now has boutique hotels and cultural tours. The old stamping grounds of the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia are overrun with tourists. I had to queue for scuba dives on a bunch of wrecked World War II Japanese ships off a remote island in the western Philippines. And when I embedded with a U.S. military unit for the 2003 invasion of Iraq, I had with me a 2002 edition Bradt tourist guide to Iraq.

Is this a good thing? Yes, and no. Professionally, as someone who spends his life attempting to ram the reality of what's going in the darkest corners of the world down the public throat, I'm delighted. A magazine article is one thing. But it's a lot better if people go voluntarily to these places and educate themselves.

But be warned. You are, in the prescient words of the Sex Pistols, taking "a cheap holiday in other people's misery." As any journalist who's ever reported a car wreck will tell you, it's amazing how many people want witnesses to their stories of death and destruction. But remember that these are invitation-only moments that you should never gatecrash. And you should always leave if the victims choose to withdraw the invitation.

Also: most journalists will tell you that exploring other people's horror isn't the healthiest way to spend your day. I was once a rather happy-go-lucky lad. Then I started covering war. Now, I'm a happy-go-lucky-and-sometimes-rather-sad lad. I'm not saying that a day out in the Normandy graveyards is going to alter your view of humanity. But it might. It might also change your view of yourself. Most of the war correspondents I know share not only a profoundly depressing view of humanity, but also an equally cynical idea of themselves. Voyeurism and self-gratification are bad enough, but building a career out of war plumbs whole new depths of poor taste. This what the 9/11 families meant when they called the Ground Zero merchandise sellers "unbelievably sick."

So be warned. There's much to be gained from dark tourism, but also much to be lost. And don't expect much of a break.

***